Since 2002, CRM project had been quickly turned from boom to bust, because number of CRM implementations did not archive expected results. As a result, it has became a scary project for many CEOs.
Although, some people claimed that CRM implementation made relationship with customers worse than not having it, there were actually benefits to customers, who got better services, new innovations, better promotions, etc. Nevertheless, the problem was these benefit cannot pay off its investment, which normally is very high due to nature of CRM complexity to involve many departments and numbers of technologies.
On the other hand, another important reason that CRM project did not achieve its expected result is because everyone realized the benefits of CRM and was scared to be left behind, which likely to happen if only one company was differentiated by CRM. Therefore, they decided to implement CRM substantially because their competitors did, and, again, they are all square.
Although, everyone was all square, CRM might be still pay itself off if the overall industry can increase size of wallet share, for example, in case of giant retail store, everyone, Tesco, Carefour, Makro, Central, The Mall, have their own CRM and customer loyalty programs to persuade customers to spend more money to these retail stores.
However, there were only a few cases that the whole industry can increase wallet share by just implementing CRM or customer loyalty programs, since there are many others factors like preference, trends, technologies, innovation, etc.
Yet, customers have the same wallet size, so, if there are winners, there must be losers. In retail chain case, the losers are local pop-and-mom shops, which could be considered as an economics failure in term of inequality and monopoly.
Posted by zenicism
Posted by zenicism